Worthy Discussion on Florida’s Summary Judgment Standard Modeled after Federal Standard

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

The Fourth District Court of Appeals in Kincaid v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 51 Fla.L.Weekly D495a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026) contains an important discussion on Florida’s summary judgment standard that is worth sharing after Florida adopted the federal summary judgment standard: We review de novo an order granting summary judgment. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510, as amended May 1, 2021, revised Florida's summary judgment rule to align with the federal summary judgment standard. Our Supreme Court explained that Florida would now follow the Celotex trilogy from the United States Supreme Court. This change was meant to “recognize the fundamental similarity between the summary judgment standard and...

03 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Good Overview of Florida’s Summary Judgment Standard

Posted by David Adelstein

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

Below is a good overview of Florida’s summary judgment standard with citations. The last paragraph discusses how a Court should construe legal texts such as contracts, particularly if there is a dispute as to a word in the contract: We review summary judgments de novo. Pial Holdings, LTD v. Riverfront Plaza, LLC, 379 So. 3d 547, 550 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024). Florida's summary judgment standard now aligns with the federal standard. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(a); In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 74 (Fla. 2021) (adopting federal summary judgment rule and standard and citing “Celotex trilogy,” Celotex Corp....

13 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Summary Judgment Standard when Written Instrument Reasonably Susceptible to Different Interpretations

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

In a recent dispute between a condominium unit owner and condominium association, an issue arose as to which party was responsible for the abatement of asbestos in the unit owner’s interior ceiling. While the unit owner was responsible for the interior ceiling, the association was responsible for incidental damage caused by performing repairs to the common elements. Here, there was evidence that the issue with asbestos abatement was caused during the association’s common element repair work which required it to remove parts of the owner's interior ceiling. The association claimed the unit owner needed to bear the costs to abate...

summary judgment standard Tag

Worthy Discussion on Florida’s Summary Judgment Standard Modeled after Federal Standard

Good Overview of Florida’s Summary Judgment Standard

Summary Judgment Standard when Written Instrument Reasonably Susceptible to Different Interpretations