06 March

Sticky

Insurance Coverage Disputes where the Focus is the Policy Language

Insurance coverage disputes are fairly common between an insured and his/her/its insurer. These are important disputes to an insured, particularly when they have been damaged and their insurer refuses to defend them from a third-party claim or otherwise denies coverage. An insured never wants to be in this position—understandably so. On the other hand, an insurance policy is not designed to cover every single risk under the sun as there are exclusions identified in policies for risks or perils that are not covered. This ultimately means an insured needs to have an appreciation of those risks or perils not covered...

26 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Don’t Neglect Mediation!

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

I believe in the process of mediation for all disputes, particularly complicated factual business disputes. I use the word "process" because that is what mediation really is – a series of actions to achieve a particular end. Mediation can be a tiring process. A frustrating process. An informative process. A continuing process. A result-oriented process. In certain instances, a futile process. Oftentimes, mediation is a mixture of all of the above. Mediation allows parties to make a business decision based on their perception of risk -- the risk of losing or the risk of damages award (greater or lesser than...

24 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Stay Money Judgment Pending Appeal

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal

A money judgment is entered against you, but you are going to appeal. Can the collection of the money judgment be stayed pending appellate review? Yes. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310 provides in material portion: (a) Application. Except as provided by general law and in subdivision (b) of this rule, a party seeking to stay a final or non-final order pending review shall file a motion in the lower tribunal, which shall have continuing jurisdiction, in its discretion, to grant, modify, or deny such relief. A stay pending review may be conditioned on the posting of a good and sufficient bond,...

18 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Innovative or Alternative Fees Can be a Win-Win!

Posted by David Adelstein

in Uncategorized

What is the traditional model of lawyering? Simply put, it is hourly billing. There is nothing wrong with this model; however, there are other alternative or innovative attorney's fee models out there that factor in performance, results, and efficiency. These are models that incentivize performance which is always in a client's best interest. Stepping out of a comfort zone is tough considering we are all creatures of habit. But, there are instances where trying something innovative or alternative is a win-win for you from a budgetary standpoint and, importantly, a results standpoint. If you are interested in learning more about...

11 February

0 Comments

Sticky

Timely Filing Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525 provides: Any party seeking a judgment taxing costs, fees, or both shall serve a motion no later than 30 days after filing of the judgment, including a judgment of dismissal, or the service of a notice of voluntary dismissal, which judgment or notice concludes the action as to that party. This is a specific statutory time period and a motion for rehearing does NOT toll this 30 day period. Jackson v. Anthony, 39 So.3d 1285, 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). This means that a motion for a final judgment taxing attorney’s fees and costs must be made...

03 February

0 Comments

Sticky

A Contractual Waiver of the Right to Challenge Venue is Enforceable

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

Many contracts contain a forum selection provision or a venue provision. Contracts may even contain language that parties agree not to challenge or otherwise waive the venue of any filed lawsuit. An example of such a provision was included in an operating agreement: This Agreement is to be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Florida (without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws). Each party hereto irrevocably agrees that any legal action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with this Agreement may be brought in any state or federal court located in Florida (or in...

29 January

0 Comments

Sticky

Impeachment as to Prior Crimes in Civil Trials

Posted by David Adelstein

in Evidence, Trial Perspectives

In a civil trial, I want to attack (impeach) the credibility of a testifying witness by bringing up a crime that witness committed. Can I do this? When it comes to impeaching the credibility of a witness based on crimes, Florida Statute s. 90.610 states in material part: (1) A party may attack the credibility of any witness, including an accused, by evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime if the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year under the law under which the witness was convicted, or if the crime involved dishonesty or...

17 January

0 Comments

Sticky

Quick Note: So You Want to Appeal an Injunction Entered Against You…

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal

So you want to appeal the issuance of an injunction entered against you. (There are numerous reasons why injunctive relief may be entered by the court in a civil context - check out this article as an example.) “If the injunction rests on factual findings, then a trial court's order must be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion; but if the injunction rests on purely legal matters, then an injunction is reviewed de novo.” Nipper v. Walton County, Florida, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D171a (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Stated differently, there is an abuse of discretion standard of appellate review...

13 January

0 Comments

Sticky

Do I or Do I Not File a Reply to Affirmative Defenses?

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

I’ll be the first to tell you that I seldom file a reply to affirmative defenses unless I am truly looking to avoid an affirmative defense – I have a defense to the defense. When I do file a reply, it is typically specific and catered to a specific defense (again, a specific defense to a specific affirmative defense). This is an important consideration and not filing a reply and specifically avoiding a defense (when you have a defense to the defense) can be problematic as an insured recently found out in an insurance coverage dispute. Thus, if you have an...

08 January

0 Comments

Sticky

Appealing Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal

After a party prevails in a lawsuit, the next issue to consider is attorney’s fees, and this is oftentimes a driving issue because attorney’s fees can be fairly significant depending on the nature of the dispute. For example, assume you lost a trial and the other side moved for attorney’s fees. You challenged entitlement to attorney’s fees and lost – the trial court granted the other side’s motion for attorney’s fees. An evidentiary hearing was held and an attorney’s fees judgment was entered. Alternatively, assume you moved for attorney’s fees and the trial court denied your motion. Are these issues...