Preparing Jury Instructions and the Standard of Review in Appealing Jury Instructions
Jury instructions are a vital component of any jury trial. These are the instructions that the trial judge reads to a jury explaining the elements of the plaintiff’s causes of action against the defendant, the defendant’s defenses, the required burden of proof, how to weigh the evidence, etc. There are jury instructions that are considered Florida standard jury instructions. But, outside of these standard jury instructions, there is a great deal of discretion in preparing and presenting jury instructions in civil trials as long as the instructions accurately reflect the law and are not misleading to the jury.
Typically, each party prepares their own jury instructions (that are not standard jury instructions). The parties then try to agree on a uniform set of instructions to present to the trial judge. It is common for parties to disagree on these jury instructions as each party prefers jury instructions that best suits their case. The judge then holds what is known as a charging conference / jury instruction conference with the parties to determine those applicable jury instructions that the trial judge will read to the jury. However, when the parties disagree as to the jury instructions to be read to the jury, this serves as the basis of an appeal at the conclusion of the trial. It is important, however, for a party to raise an objection during the charging conference / jury instruction conference to a jury instruction that the party may later need to appeal. See High, Clarke & Feneis, Inc. v. Public Service Mut. Ins., 238 So.2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970) (affirming judgment because party failed to preserve objection to jury instruction by failing to raise objection at charging conference). It is also important for parties to ensure there is a court reporter at the jury instruction conference so that any objection is properly preserved and made part of the record for the appeal. See Wright v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Miami, 256 So.2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (affirming judgment because the record failed to disclose any objection made to the jury instructions).
The standard of appellate review relating to jury instructions is abuse of discretion (a standard of review previously discussed in prior postings). See Barton Protective Services, Inc. v. Faber, 745 So.2d 968, 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). As best articulated by the Fourth District Court of Appeal:
A trial court is accorded broad discretion in formulating appropriate jury instructions and its decision should not be reversed unless the error complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice or the instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury. A decision to give or withhold a jury instruction is to be reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard of review. The party defending the instructions on appeal must show that the requested instructions accurately stated the applicable law, the facts supported giving the instruction, and that the instruction was necessary in order to allow the jury to properly resolve all the issues in the case. If the jury instructions, as a whole, fairly state the applicable law to the jury, the failure to give a particular instruction will not be an error.
See id (internal citations omitted).
Please contact David Adelstein at firstname.lastname@example.org or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. You can follow David Adelstein on Twitter @DavidAdelstein1.