FDUTPA Can Give Rise to a Claim Against a Person in an Individual Capacity

In Florida, there is a statutory claim under Florida's Deceptive Unfair Trade Practices Act. This also goes by its acronym FDUTPA, and is referred to as a FDUTPA claim. For more information in FDUTPA, please check here. Did you know you can assert a FDUTPA claim against a person in an individual capacity? And this has nothing to do with piercing the corporate veil? In Thompson Nation Holdings, LLC v. Gonzalez, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2030a (Fla. 3d DCA 2025), a customer sued her moving company's principal, individually, under FDUTPA. A judgment was obtained against the principal, and the appellate court affirmed the...

03 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Plaintiff MUST Confer Direct Benefit on Defendant to Prove Unjust Enrichment

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

“The elements of a cause of action for unjust enrichment are: (1) plaintiff has conferred benefit on the defendant, who has knowledge thereof; (2) defendant voluntarily accepts and retains the benefit conferred; and (3) the circumstances are such that it would be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without paying the value thereof to the plaintiff.” CFLB Partnership, LLC v. Diamond Blue International, Inc., 47 Fla.L.Weekly D1812a (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Regarding the first element “plaintiff has conferred benefit on the defendant,” the benefit conferred must be DIRECT and NOT an indirect benefit. Irrespective of whether or not I agree...

28 November

0 Comments

Sticky

To Pierce Corporate Veil, there Needs to be Sufficient Findings of Improper Conduct

Posted by David Adelstein

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

A trial court’s decision whether to pierce the corporate veil is reviewed under a de novo standard of appellate review because it presents a pure issue of law. Flooring Depot FTL, Inc. v. Wurtzebach, 2021 WL 5348903, *2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). The recent decision in Flooring Depot FTL demonstrating that piercing a corporate veil is not so easy, and really, far from it. In this case, homeowners did not receive approximate 1,912 square feet of purchased flooring. The homeowners sued the flooring company for not providing all of the flooring they paid for and claimed fraud. The homeowners attempted to...

22 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Piercing the Corporate Veil is NO Easy Feat

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

Piercing a corporate veil to go after principals in their personal capacity is no easy feat. And it should not be viewed as an easy feat. While there are times trying to pierce the corporate veil is warranted, a party still MUST PROVE the requirements to pierce the protections of a corporate structure to go after the principals in charge of the corporate entity. Otherwise, doing business under a corporate structure would be severely emasculated. To pierce the corporate veil, a party must prove the following elements: “(i) [the person] dominated and controlled [the corporate entity] to such an extent that the...

pierce corporate veil Tag

FDUTPA Can Give Rise to a Claim Against a Person in an Individual Capacity

Plaintiff MUST Confer Direct Benefit on Defendant to Prove Unjust Enrichment

To Pierce Corporate Veil, there Needs to be Sufficient Findings of Improper Conduct

Piercing the Corporate Veil is NO Easy Feat