03 December

Sticky

Res Judicata and 4 Requirements that Must be Demonstrated

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

A recent case discusses the doctrine of res judicata after the trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice based on this doctrine. “The doctrine of res judicata provides that a judgment on the merits in an earlier suit bars a later suit on the same cause of action between the same parties or others in privity with those parties.” Res judicata bars a subsequent lawsuit when the following identities exist in both the original lawsuit and the subsequent lawsuit: “(1) identity of the thing being sued for; (2) identity of the cause of action; (3) identity of the parties; and...

19 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Mandatory Forum Selection Provisions

Posted by David Adelstein

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

When reviewing a contract, check to see if there is a forum selection provision. This provision will dictate where a dispute shall or may be brought. Forum selection provisions are construed as either mandatory forum selection provisions (the dispute has to be brought in this exclusive forum) or permissive forum selection provisions (the dispute may be brought in this forum, but other forums would work too). Be mindful of forum selection provisions because they will come into play if a dispute unfolds. “Permissive [forum selection] clauses constitute nothing more than a consent to jurisdiction and venue in the named forum and...

12 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Doctrine of Respondeat Superior

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

The doctrine of respondeat superior provides that “an employer cannot be held liable for the tortious or criminal acts of an employee, unless the acts were committed during the course of the employment and to further a purpose or interest, however excessive or misguided, of the employer.” “An employee's conduct is within the scope of his employment, where (1) the conduct is of the kind he was employed to perform, (2) the conduct occurs substantially within the time and space limits authorized or required by the work to be performed, and (3) the conduct is activated at least in part...

05 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Writ of Prohibition to Prevent Trial Court from Exceeding Jurisdiction

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal

A writ of “[p]rohibition lies to prevent a court from acting in excess of its jurisdiction.” Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hoffman, 2022 WL 14681489, *1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022). An example of an appellate court granting a writ of prohibition can be found in Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. As an important backdrop, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530 governs motions for rehearing. A motion for rehearing “must be served not later than 15 days after the return of the verdict in a jury action or the date of filing of the judgment in a non-jury action.” Fla.R.Civ.P....

23 October

0 Comments

Sticky

Directed Verdict Granted where No View of Evidence Could Support Jury Verdict

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal, Standard of Review

In this blog posting, I discussed a case where the appellate reversed a final judgment in favor of a plaintiff on a breach of contract claim and remanded for the trial court to enter judgment in favor of the defendant. The appellate court found that the trial court should have entered defendant’s motion for directed verdict on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim. There are three interesting points regarding a motion for directed verdict. One, a motion for directed verdict is reviewed under a de novo standard of appellate review. Two: A motion for directed verdict should be granted only where no view of the...

08 October

0 Comments

Sticky

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Directing Trial Court to Take Action

Posted by David Adelstein

in Appeal, Trial Perspectives

“To be entitled to mandamus relief, the petitioner must demonstrate a clear legal right to the performance of a ministerial duty.” “A ministerial duty is one where there is no room for the exercise of discretion, and the performance being required is directed by law.” Further, “[a] writ of mandamus may issue to require a timely ruling on a matter pending before a lower tribunal.” If an appellate court issues a writ of mandamus, it merely “directs the trial court to take action, but does not decide the merits.” Griffin Windows and Doors, LLC v. Pomeroy, 47 Fla.L.Weekly D2013b (Fla. 3d...

01 October

0 Comments

Sticky

Considerations: Independent Tort Doctrine and Claim Known as Equitable Accounting

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

A recent Florida opinion discussed the importance and application of the independent tort doctrine. Please check out my post on the independent tort doctrine here. In a nutshell, as stated in the post, “Florida law does not allow a party damaged by a breach of contract to recover exactly the same contract damages via a tort claim.” Bedoyan v. Samra, 47 Fla.L.Weekly D1955a (Fla. 3d 2022). In addition to the independent tort doctrine, this case also discussed an affirmative claim known as equitable accounting. As stated by the claim, it is an equitable claim. “To state a claim for an equitable...

28 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Waiver is a Voluntary Relinquishment of a Known Right that Must be Proven with a Clear Showing

Posted by David Adelstein

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

The affirmative defense of waiver is a commonly pled affirmative defense. A recent Florida appellate opinion, Smith v. Carlton, 2022 WL 4390651 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022), discusses waiver and its application under Florida law. The case focuses on an implied waiver, which is the most common form of a waiver defense or argument since it is premised on a party's conduct and actions. (An express waiver is easy because there is an expressed intent to waive the requirement.) This case dealt with the sale of a horse farm. Prior to closing, the Buyers did a walk-through of the property and saw...

17 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Dismissal Without Prejudice does NOT Trigger Attorney’s Fees under Proposal for Settlements

Posted by David Adelstein

in Trial Perspectives

When it comes to proposal for settlements from a defendant, there is both good news and bad news. If a defendant serves a proposal for settlement, and the case is dismissed without prejudice, the good news is that the defendant is dismissed. The bad news is that the dismissal without prejudice will NOT trigger the defendant’s right to obtain attorney’s fees pursuant to the proposal for settlement. In Annesser v. Innovative Service Technology Management Services Inc., 47 Fla.L.Weekly D1738a (Fla. 3d DCA 2022), a defendant served a proposal for settlement after being served with the complaint. The defendant moved to dismiss...

10 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Bert Harris Act and Competing Motions for Summary Judgment

Posted by David Adelstein

in Standard of Review, Trial Perspectives

In previous articles, I have discussed the Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act also known as the Bert Harris Act. (See here and here.) A recent case, Brevard County, Florida v. Waters Mark Development Enterprises, LC, 47 Fla.L.Weekly D1863c (Fla. 5thDCA 2022), discusses the Bert Harris Act when there are competing motions for summary judgment. In this case, the plaintiff purchased land in Brevard County with plans to develop a residential subdivision. After the plaintiff purchased the land, the County amended its comprehensive land use plan that lowered the developmental density. Whereas the comprehensive land use plan originally...