В сложной финансовой ситуации приходит на помощь кредит наличными в Казахстане.

Recoverable / Taxable Costs to the Prevailing Party

Posted by David Adelstein on August 22, 2015
Appeal, Trial Perspectives



When a party prevails in litigation, the party should be entitled to recover its “costs” incurred in connection with the litigation. This is different than that party’s attorney’s fees. See Fla. Stat. s. 57.041 (“The party recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment.”).

While the taxable or recoverable costs a party is entitled to is within the discretion of the trial court, there are important guidelines to be followed known as the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions. See Fla.R.Civ.P. Taxation of Costs.

The guidelines set forth: (A) costs that should be a recoverable / taxable cost (e.g., deposition transcripts, court reporter fees, documents and exhibits, testifying expert witnesses, subpoena costs); (B) costs that may be a recoverable / taxable cost (e.g., mediation fees, reasonable travel expenses of expert, electronic discovery costs); and (C) costs that should not be a recoverable / taxable cost (e.g., travel time and expenses of attorney, travel time of expert, non-testifying experts, long distance calls, privilege review of documents).  Se below for the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions:


Download (PDF, 72KB)


A losing party may appeal the award of costs to the prevailing party, especially if those costs are unreasonable or do not comport to the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions.

For example, in a recent case, a losing party appealed the trial court’s award of expert costs. The expert did not testify at trial for the prevailing party. The appellate court reversed the award of costs to the prevailing party maintaining that costs of non-testifying experts or experts that are not qualified to testify at trial are not recoverable / taxable costs. See Woodbridge Holdings, LLC v. Prescott Group Aggressive Small Cap Master Fund, 2015 WL 4747174, *1-*2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).


Please contact David Adelstein at dadelstein@gmail.com or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. You can follow David Adelstein on Twitter @DavidAdelstein1.

Please follow and like us:

Tags: , , , , , ,

Contact Me Now

Prove YOUR Case!


David Adelstein ♦

(954) 361-4720 ♦