The Simple, All-or-Nothing Verdict Form
Attention should be given to the verdict form you want the jury to fill out after listening to and seeing the evidence presented in the case. This verdict form dictates how the jury decides the facts in your case in the context of the theme of your case and the jury instructions. Needless to say, the verdict form is very, very important!
There are times when a party (such as one hiring someone from https://www.keatingfirmlaw.com/personal-injury-attorney-columbus) may want a simple, all-or-nothing verdict form. A party may like this (such as the plaintiff) versus a special interrogatory form that contains numerous potentially confusing questions the jury is asked to answer. For example, an all-or-nothing verdict form may simply ask the jury as the first question whether the defendant breached the contract. If the jury answers yes, then they need to answer the second question which would be the amount of damages that should be awarded to the plaintiff as a consequence of the defendant’s breach of the contract. On the other hand, if the jury answers no to the first question, they should not answer any more questions as the jury’s verdict is in favor of the defendant. This is just one of the strategies that could be used by a car accident lawyer jacksonville fl, or indeed any other, in the state.
In Finkel v. Batista, 41 Fla.L.Weekly D2279b (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), the liability portion of the trial was bifurcated from the damages portion. The case dealt with a car accident that resulted in personal injury which professionals similar to a Las Vegas Car Accident Lawyer usually work on. During the liability portion, the jury found the defendant 100% liable for the car accident. Since the car accident resulted in personal injury they would have to pay damages to the injured party. If you find yourself in a similar situation, you may have to go through a verdict form with a lawyer similar to these Jonesboro Lawyers who may be handling your case. During the damages trial, the parties agreed on a verdict form that read:
- Evan Finkel [Defendant] was negligent. Was such negligence the legal cause of loss, injury or damage to the Plaintiff, Yarielsi Batista?
If you answered “NO” to Question 1, your verdict is for the Defendant, Evan Finkel and you should not proceed further except to date and sign this verdict form and return it to the courtroom. If you answered “YES” to Question 1, please answer Questions 2 and 3.
The jury answered “No” to this first question finding for the defendant; no damages were awarded to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff appealed arguing that she should be entitled to damages for medical expenses she incurred. The trial court agreed and ordered a new jury trial. The appellate court reversed with directions to reinstate the jury’s verdict:
[T]he plaintiffs here did not object to the verdict form that invited the jury to return a verdict on an “all-or-nothing” basis. The jury answered the first question presented to it in the negative, finding that the accident was not the legal cause of loss, injury, or damage to Ms. Batista [plaintiff]. Consistent with verdict form’s instructions, the jury answered no further questions and awarded no damages. It is well-settled law that “the jury cannot be faulted for doing exactly what it was instructed to do” in these circumstances. For these reasons, we reverse the order granting a new trial.
Finkel, supra (internal citation omitted).
Please contact David Adelstein at firstname.lastname@example.org or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. You can follow David Adelstein on Twitter @DavidAdelstein1.